https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757553 The Jharkhand HC allowed a petition seeking revival of an appeal that was dismissed for non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court relied on precedent from a coordinate bench and found no intent to avoid payment of the 7.5% pre-deposit. The appellate authority's dismissal order was quashed and set aside, with the appeal revived subject to deposit of the required pre-deposit amount within two weeks. The petitioner's appeal was allowed. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2025 23:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757553 The Jharkhand HC allowed a petition seeking revival of an appeal that was dismissed for non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court relied on precedent from a coordinate bench and found no intent to avoid payment of the 7.5% pre-deposit. The appellate authority's dismissal order was quashed and set aside, with the appeal revived subject to deposit of the required pre-deposit amount within two weeks. The petitioner's appeal was allowed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757553