<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757538</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of expenditure claimed by an assessee operating an electricity generation plant. Despite the power purchase agreement being suspended by HPCC since May 2005 following HERC&#039;s order, the tribunal held that the assessee could claim revenue expenditure and depreciation. The tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that temporary business suspension was justified, the assessee maintained the plant in running condition for potential resumption, and deemed income declaration was not required until fixed tariff realization. The case involved a pending SC suit regarding tariff payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757538</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of expenditure claimed by an assessee operating an electricity generation plant. Despite the power purchase agreement being suspended by HPCC since May 2005 following HERC&#039;s order, the tribunal held that the assessee could claim revenue expenditure and depreciation. The tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that temporary business suspension was justified, the assessee maintained the plant in running condition for potential resumption, and deemed income declaration was not required until fixed tariff realization. The case involved a pending SC suit regarding tariff payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>