<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757535</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed cross-appeals from both the assessee and the revenue, reducing the addition of alleged bogus purchases to 3% of Rs. 7,20,30,027. This decision aligned with prior assessments, ensuring consistency and fairness. The tribunal emphasized the need for a reasonable opportunity to present the case and cross-examine evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:07:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757535</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed cross-appeals from both the assessee and the revenue, reducing the addition of alleged bogus purchases to 3% of Rs. 7,20,30,027. This decision aligned with prior assessments, ensuring consistency and fairness. The tribunal emphasized the need for a reasonable opportunity to present the case and cross-examine evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>