https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757515 The appellate authority set aside the penalties imposed on the CHA firm under Customs Act sections 114(i) and 114(iii). The judgment concluded that the allegations of abetment in exporting prohibited goods were unsustainable due to the absence of evidence indicating the appellant's knowledge of the concealed red sandalwoods. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing that mere violations of CHALR 2004 without knowledge do not constitute abetment. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:06:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757515 The appellate authority set aside the penalties imposed on the CHA firm under Customs Act sections 114(i) and 114(iii). The judgment concluded that the allegations of abetment in exporting prohibited goods were unsustainable due to the absence of evidence indicating the appellant's knowledge of the concealed red sandalwoods. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing that mere violations of CHALR 2004 without knowledge do not constitute abetment. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757515