https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757514 Delhi HC held that NCLT has jurisdiction to examine allegedly forged documents in oppression and mismanagement cases. The court relied on Channel Foods case where NCLAT ruled that NCLT possesses wide powers under Companies Act and NCLT Rules 2016 to investigate oppression allegations, including ordering forensic examination of disputed documents. Rule 43 of NCLT Rules 2016 empowers NCLT to adjudicate forgery claims and direct expert examination. The matter was remanded to NCLT for proper adjudication after lower tribunal incorrectly declined jurisdiction over forgery allegations. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757514 Delhi HC held that NCLT has jurisdiction to examine allegedly forged documents in oppression and mismanagement cases. The court relied on Channel Foods case where NCLAT ruled that NCLT possesses wide powers under Companies Act and NCLT Rules 2016 to investigate oppression allegations, including ordering forensic examination of disputed documents. Rule 43 of NCLT Rules 2016 empowers NCLT to adjudicate forgery claims and direct expert examination. The matter was remanded to NCLT for proper adjudication after lower tribunal incorrectly declined jurisdiction over forgery allegations. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757514