<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Dismissed: Individual Lacks Standing Without Company in Share Transfer Rectification Case Under NCLT Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80767</link>
    <description>This case pertains to a prayer for rectification in the Register of Members concerning the transfer of shares, invoking Section 154 of the NCLT Rules. The key points are: The appeal against the relief granted by NCLT in the Principal Company Petitions was sustainable only when the Company (Appellant No.1) was contesting the matter as a legal entity. However, upon withdrawal by the Company, Appellant No. 2 (an individual) had no cause of action flowing from Appellant No.1. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without prejudice to Appellant No. 2&#039;s rights u/s 59 of the Companies Act. The relief sought for re-entering names and share configuration in the Register of Members could not be pressed by Appellant No. 2 in the absence of an effec.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Dismissed: Individual Lacks Standing Without Company in Share Transfer Rectification Case Under NCLT Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80767</link>
      <description>This case pertains to a prayer for rectification in the Register of Members concerning the transfer of shares, invoking Section 154 of the NCLT Rules. The key points are: The appeal against the relief granted by NCLT in the Principal Company Petitions was sustainable only when the Company (Appellant No.1) was contesting the matter as a legal entity. However, upon withdrawal by the Company, Appellant No. 2 (an individual) had no cause of action flowing from Appellant No.1. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed without prejudice to Appellant No. 2&#039;s rights u/s 59 of the Companies Act. The relief sought for re-entering names and share configuration in the Register of Members could not be pressed by Appellant No. 2 in the absence of an effec.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>