<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1217 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757513</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed company appeals concerning share transfer and rectification of the Register of Members under section 154 of NCLT Rules. The primary appellant company withdrew from proceedings, leaving the second appellant individual without standing to contest the NCLT&#039;s rectification order. The tribunal held that relief against rectification of member register could only be sought when the company itself contested proceedings. Since the company chose not to contest, the individual appellant lacked cause of action flowing from the company. Appeals were dismissed without prejudice to the second appellant&#039;s rights to pursue appropriate remedies under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1217 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757513</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed company appeals concerning share transfer and rectification of the Register of Members under section 154 of NCLT Rules. The primary appellant company withdrew from proceedings, leaving the second appellant individual without standing to contest the NCLT&#039;s rectification order. The tribunal held that relief against rectification of member register could only be sought when the company itself contested proceedings. Since the company chose not to contest, the individual appellant lacked cause of action flowing from the company. Appeals were dismissed without prejudice to the second appellant&#039;s rights to pursue appropriate remedies under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>