https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757511 The HC addressed the petitioner's application to recall the judgment in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 2903/2019, identifying factual and typographical errors in the original judgment. Corrections were made, clarifying that certain findings were allegations by the prosecution. The Court found no grounds for recalling the judgment but granted the petitioner liberty to seek other reliefs in an appropriate forum and extended interim protection for three weeks. The application for recall was disposed of, concluding the matter. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757511 The HC addressed the petitioner's application to recall the judgment in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 2903/2019, identifying factual and typographical errors in the original judgment. Corrections were made, clarifying that certain findings were allegations by the prosecution. The Court found no grounds for recalling the judgment but granted the petitioner liberty to seek other reliefs in an appropriate forum and extended interim protection for three weeks. The application for recall was disposed of, concluding the matter. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757511