<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal: No Evidence of Willful Tax Evasion in CENVAT Credit Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80766</link>
    <description>This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 1,30,84,835/- which was not permissible under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. As per Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, a show-cause notice for non-payment of service tax must be issued within 18 months, extendable to 5 years in case of fraud, misstatement or suppression of facts. The company had disclosed all relevant information regarding CENVAT credit availed in its ST-3 returns. The Commissioner alleged misstatement and contravention with intent to evade tax, which the High Court found perverse as the show-cause notice did not mention willful misstatement or suppression. The S.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal: No Evidence of Willful Tax Evasion in CENVAT Credit Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80766</link>
      <description>This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs. 1,30,84,835/- which was not permissible under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. As per Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, a show-cause notice for non-payment of service tax must be issued within 18 months, extendable to 5 years in case of fraud, misstatement or suppression of facts. The company had disclosed all relevant information regarding CENVAT credit availed in its ST-3 returns. The Commissioner alleged misstatement and contravention with intent to evade tax, which the High Court found perverse as the show-cause notice did not mention willful misstatement or suppression. The S.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:05:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>