<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1209 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757505</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in filing the special leave petitions was not satisfactorily explained, so the applications for condonation were rejected and the petitions were dismissed without examination on merits. Separately, where the assessee had made the prescribed pre-deposit and the CESTAT had restored the appeals, the Court directed that the matters be considered by the CESTAT on their merits and disposed of in accordance with law, with no further consideration required by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1209 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757505</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in filing the special leave petitions was not satisfactorily explained, so the applications for condonation were rejected and the petitions were dismissed without examination on merits. Separately, where the assessee had made the prescribed pre-deposit and the CESTAT had restored the appeals, the Court directed that the matters be considered by the CESTAT on their merits and disposed of in accordance with law, with no further consideration required by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>