https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757498 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, holding that denial of CENVAT credit totaling Rs.6,79,945/- was unjustified. The tribunal ruled that credit cannot be denied merely because service provider's registration number was missing from invoices or invoices showed office address instead of factory address, provided services were actually received and tax was paid. Credit was also allowed for service tax on rent for additional factory premises and duty on MS angles and electrodes used for maintenance, despite contrary HC precedent cited by revenue authorities. en-us Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757498 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, holding that denial of CENVAT credit totaling Rs.6,79,945/- was unjustified. The tribunal ruled that credit cannot be denied merely because service provider's registration number was missing from invoices or invoices showed office address instead of factory address, provided services were actually received and tax was paid. Credit was also allowed for service tax on rent for additional factory premises and duty on MS angles and electrodes used for maintenance, despite contrary HC precedent cited by revenue authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757498