<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757495</link>
    <description>An adverse order passed without affording the petitioner a personal hearing was treated as contrary to the principles of natural justice. The absence of notice and opportunity to be heard warranted interference, and the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to permit filing of a reply, issue notice, and grant a personal hearing before passing a new order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757495</link>
      <description>An adverse order passed without affording the petitioner a personal hearing was treated as contrary to the principles of natural justice. The absence of notice and opportunity to be heard warranted interference, and the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to permit filing of a reply, issue notice, and grant a personal hearing before passing a new order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>