https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757487 Bail was declined in allegations of a fake-firm GST fraud involving bogus invoices, wrongful input tax credit and allied offences. The Court relied on complaint material, the prosecution report, cognizance order and statements of persons connected with the firms to treat the petitioner as the alleged mastermind behind a wider network of fictitious entities. The plea based on a circular and parity with a co-accused was rejected because the petitioner's role was found distinct and more serious. Given the gravity of the alleged economic offence and prima facie support for forgery, fraud and GST evasion, bail was not warranted and the application was rejected. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 10:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757487 Bail was declined in allegations of a fake-firm GST fraud involving bogus invoices, wrongful input tax credit and allied offences. The Court relied on complaint material, the prosecution report, cognizance order and statements of persons connected with the firms to treat the petitioner as the alleged mastermind behind a wider network of fictitious entities. The plea based on a circular and parity with a co-accused was rejected because the petitioner's role was found distinct and more serious. Given the gravity of the alleged economic offence and prima facie support for forgery, fraud and GST evasion, bail was not warranted and the application was rejected. Case-Laws GST Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757487