<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 10 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37991</link>
    <description>The court held that the reference application questioning the entitlement to obsolescence allowance for an old kiln was not maintainable under the Income-tax Act provisions. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order granting obsolescence allowance was not amended by the subsequent rejection of a miscellaneous petition, thus the reference did not arise from the amended order. Additionally, the court ruled that a second question for reference, not part of the original application before the Tribunal, could not be directed for reference to the High Court. Consequently, the court dismissed the income-tax case as both questions were deemed not maintainable for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 10 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37991</link>
      <description>The court held that the reference application questioning the entitlement to obsolescence allowance for an old kiln was not maintainable under the Income-tax Act provisions. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order granting obsolescence allowance was not amended by the subsequent rejection of a miscellaneous petition, thus the reference did not arise from the amended order. Additionally, the court ruled that a second question for reference, not part of the original application before the Tribunal, could not be directed for reference to the High Court. Consequently, the court dismissed the income-tax case as both questions were deemed not maintainable for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>