<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries regarding the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found the invocation of Section 263 by the PCIT unjustified, as the original assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue. The appeal was allowed, and the original assessment order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1181 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries regarding the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found the invocation of Section 263 by the PCIT unjustified, as the original assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to revenue. The appeal was allowed, and the original assessment order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>