<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757453</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the validity of property sale under SARFAESI Act. The tribunal held that respondent validly acquired shares and flat through SARFAESI proceedings, constituting transmission by operation of law. The appellant company&#039;s shareholder lacked title to company property. The NCLT properly condoned filing delays caused by appellant&#039;s protracted correspondence aimed at frustrating respondent&#039;s rights. The acquisition of share certificate and flat was deemed valid consideration under enforcement proceedings, with transmission occurring by legal operation rather than party volition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757453</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the validity of property sale under SARFAESI Act. The tribunal held that respondent validly acquired shares and flat through SARFAESI proceedings, constituting transmission by operation of law. The appellant company&#039;s shareholder lacked title to company property. The NCLT properly condoned filing delays caused by appellant&#039;s protracted correspondence aimed at frustrating respondent&#039;s rights. The acquisition of share certificate and flat was deemed valid consideration under enforcement proceedings, with transmission occurring by legal operation rather than party volition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>