<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitral Award Challenge Dismissed: Resolution Plan Extinguishes Future Claims; Rejection Not Res Judicata.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80698</link>
    <description>Challenge to an interim arbitral award u/s 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key issues are: (1) whether the rejection of an application u/s 16 regarding the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction operates as res judicata for the interim award, and (2) whether alleged future losses covered by a counterclaim could be dismissed due to the approval of a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The court held that the earlier rejection u/s 16 did not operate as res judicata, as the subsequent approval of the Resolution Plan extinguishing creditors&#039; rights altered the scenario, providing a fresh cause of action. Regarding the second issue, the court ruled that all claims, including future losses, stood extinguish.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:17:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitral Award Challenge Dismissed: Resolution Plan Extinguishes Future Claims; Rejection Not Res Judicata.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80698</link>
      <description>Challenge to an interim arbitral award u/s 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The key issues are: (1) whether the rejection of an application u/s 16 regarding the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction operates as res judicata for the interim award, and (2) whether alleged future losses covered by a counterclaim could be dismissed due to the approval of a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The court held that the earlier rejection u/s 16 did not operate as res judicata, as the subsequent approval of the Resolution Plan extinguishing creditors&#039; rights altered the scenario, providing a fresh cause of action. Regarding the second issue, the court ruled that all claims, including future losses, stood extinguish.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:17:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>