<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1153 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757449</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the Committee of Creditors&#039; rejection of a settlement proposal under Section 12A of IBC. The appellant&#039;s settlement proposal required extinguishing liability of corporate debtor, promoter and guarantors, including release of personal guarantees. The CoC rejected this proposal through 100% e-voting, preferring a resolution plan that retained personal guarantees against total dues of Rs.238 crores. The NCLAT held the CoC&#039;s decision was well-deliberated and not arbitrary, noting the appellant received full opportunity. The tribunal distinguished settlement proposals from resolution plans, affirming the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1153 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757449</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the Committee of Creditors&#039; rejection of a settlement proposal under Section 12A of IBC. The appellant&#039;s settlement proposal required extinguishing liability of corporate debtor, promoter and guarantors, including release of personal guarantees. The CoC rejected this proposal through 100% e-voting, preferring a resolution plan that retained personal guarantees against total dues of Rs.238 crores. The NCLAT held the CoC&#039;s decision was well-deliberated and not arbitrary, noting the appellant received full opportunity. The tribunal distinguished settlement proposals from resolution plans, affirming the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>