<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1148 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757444</link>
    <description>The HC concluded that the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the excisability of goods, was not maintainable. The Court determined that the issue fell within the jurisdiction of the SC, as per Section 35L. Consequently, the appellant was directed to present the appeal before the SC, leaving all contentions open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1148 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757444</link>
      <description>The HC concluded that the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the excisability of goods, was not maintainable. The Court determined that the issue fell within the jurisdiction of the SC, as per Section 35L. Consequently, the appellant was directed to present the appeal before the SC, leaving all contentions open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>