<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 27 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37983</link>
    <description>A retiring partner&#039;s later assignment and release of his interest in partnership assets, goodwill and immovable properties in favour of the continuing partners constitutes a transfer attracting capital gains tax. The firm was treated as continuing business after retirement, not as having been dissolved, but the taxable event arose only when the assignment instrument was executed. As that document was executed on 9 March 1961 and not during the relevant previous year for assessment year 1960-61, the receipt did not attract capital gains tax in that year. The referred question was answered in the negative, against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 27 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37983</link>
      <description>A retiring partner&#039;s later assignment and release of his interest in partnership assets, goodwill and immovable properties in favour of the continuing partners constitutes a transfer attracting capital gains tax. The firm was treated as continuing business after retirement, not as having been dissolved, but the taxable event arose only when the assignment instrument was executed. As that document was executed on 9 March 1961 and not during the relevant previous year for assessment year 1960-61, the receipt did not attract capital gains tax in that year. The referred question was answered in the negative, against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>