<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1156 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the Rs. 95,50,000/- penalty under Section 271D, as it was based on presumption without concrete evidence. It also deleted the enhanced penalty of Rs. 23,50,000/- for bearer cheque transactions, recognizing the assessee&#039;s bona fide impression and ignorance of the law as a reasonable cause under Section 273B. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:52:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1156 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the Rs. 95,50,000/- penalty under Section 271D, as it was based on presumption without concrete evidence. It also deleted the enhanced penalty of Rs. 23,50,000/- for bearer cheque transactions, recognizing the assessee&#039;s bona fide impression and ignorance of the law as a reasonable cause under Section 273B. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>