<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash sale proceeds for immovable property not liable for anti-abuse tax on cash transactions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80693</link>
    <description>Section 271D penalty for contravention of Section 269SS was imposed on consideration received in cash towards sale of property. The Tribunal, following precedents, held that the &#039;specified sum&#039; u/s 269SS applies only to advances received for immovable property transfer, not the consideration itself. Consequently, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty levied u/s 271D, deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:07:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash sale proceeds for immovable property not liable for anti-abuse tax on cash transactions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80693</link>
      <description>Section 271D penalty for contravention of Section 269SS was imposed on consideration received in cash towards sale of property. The Tribunal, following precedents, held that the &#039;specified sum&#039; u/s 269SS applies only to advances received for immovable property transfer, not the consideration itself. Consequently, the Tribunal directed deletion of the penalty levied u/s 271D, deciding in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:07:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>