<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1110 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757406</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 9 of IBC. The corporate debtor failed to establish a pre-existing dispute regarding operational debt exceeding Rs. 1 lakh owed to the operational creditor for goods received. Claims of dispute due to GST raids and alleged fake invoices were unsubstantiated as GST proceedings did not constitute genuine pre-existing dispute between parties concerning the operational debt. Arguments regarding company solvency and preference for civil proceedings were deemed irrelevant for CIRP initiation. The adjudicating authority correctly admitted the operational creditor&#039;s application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1110 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757406</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 9 of IBC. The corporate debtor failed to establish a pre-existing dispute regarding operational debt exceeding Rs. 1 lakh owed to the operational creditor for goods received. Claims of dispute due to GST raids and alleged fake invoices were unsubstantiated as GST proceedings did not constitute genuine pre-existing dispute between parties concerning the operational debt. Arguments regarding company solvency and preference for civil proceedings were deemed irrelevant for CIRP initiation. The adjudicating authority correctly admitted the operational creditor&#039;s application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>