<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1108 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757404</link>
    <description>PMLA jurisdiction depends on an underlying scheduled offence because &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; can arise only from criminal activity relating to such an offence. The Court stated that, where the police case and charge-sheet disclose only non-scheduled offences, prosecution for money laundering cannot be sustained unless a scheduled offence is registered, is pending inquiry, or is otherwise found in criminal proceedings before the competent court. It also held that the Enforcement Directorate cannot independently treat non-scheduled offences as scheduled offences or assume jurisdiction to register an ECIR on that basis. The PMLA complaint, prosecution case, and charges were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh if a competent criminal court later frames charges for scheduled offences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1108 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757404</link>
      <description>PMLA jurisdiction depends on an underlying scheduled offence because &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; can arise only from criminal activity relating to such an offence. The Court stated that, where the police case and charge-sheet disclose only non-scheduled offences, prosecution for money laundering cannot be sustained unless a scheduled offence is registered, is pending inquiry, or is otherwise found in criminal proceedings before the competent court. It also held that the Enforcement Directorate cannot independently treat non-scheduled offences as scheduled offences or assume jurisdiction to register an ECIR on that basis. The PMLA complaint, prosecution case, and charges were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh if a competent criminal court later frames charges for scheduled offences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>