https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757403 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the Order-In-Original confirming a service tax demand, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Despite the petitioner's health-related claims, the court emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking Article 226. However, the court granted the petitioner an additional 30 days to appeal before the Appellate Authority, allowing the appeal to be decided on its merits without considering the limitation period. This decision underscored the importance of procedural fairness and the exhaustion of statutory remedies in tax recovery matters. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2024 22:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757403 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the Order-In-Original confirming a service tax demand, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. Despite the petitioner's health-related claims, the court emphasized the necessity of exhausting statutory remedies before invoking Article 226. However, the court granted the petitioner an additional 30 days to appeal before the Appellate Authority, allowing the appeal to be decided on its merits without considering the limitation period. This decision underscored the importance of procedural fairness and the exhaustion of statutory remedies in tax recovery matters. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757403