<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757399</link>
    <description>Extended limitation for service tax could not be invoked where the demand rested mainly on 26AS data and sample invoices, and the Department failed to conduct adequate verification of the assessee&#039;s address, records, or the nature of services rendered. Mere third-party financial data, without meaningful inquiry or corroborative evidence, was insufficient to sustain a best judgment assessment. The record also disclosed no positive material showing wilful suppression, misstatement, or intent to evade tax, which are necessary to justify the extended period. As a result, the demand and penalties could not be sustained on limitation, while the merits were left undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:04:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1103 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757399</link>
      <description>Extended limitation for service tax could not be invoked where the demand rested mainly on 26AS data and sample invoices, and the Department failed to conduct adequate verification of the assessee&#039;s address, records, or the nature of services rendered. Mere third-party financial data, without meaningful inquiry or corroborative evidence, was insufficient to sustain a best judgment assessment. The record also disclosed no positive material showing wilful suppression, misstatement, or intent to evade tax, which are necessary to justify the extended period. As a result, the demand and penalties could not be sustained on limitation, while the merits were left undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>