<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1506 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456897</link>
    <description>Where forgery or fabrication of statutory records is pleaded in an oppression and mismanagement dispute, the NCLT may exercise its procedural powers under the Companies Act, 2013 and NCLT Rules, 2016 to require production of documents and, for recorded reasons, refer disputed records for forensic examination. The tribunal&#039;s authority is supported by natural justice and the need for effective fact-finding in aid of adjudication. The pleadings in this matter were found to include allegations of forged signatures and disputed documents relating to financial statements, a power of attorney and PAN cards, so the forensic reference was within the scope of the case and the appellate interference was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:33:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1506 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456897</link>
      <description>Where forgery or fabrication of statutory records is pleaded in an oppression and mismanagement dispute, the NCLT may exercise its procedural powers under the Companies Act, 2013 and NCLT Rules, 2016 to require production of documents and, for recorded reasons, refer disputed records for forensic examination. The tribunal&#039;s authority is supported by natural justice and the need for effective fact-finding in aid of adjudication. The pleadings in this matter were found to include allegations of forged signatures and disputed documents relating to financial statements, a power of attorney and PAN cards, so the forensic reference was within the scope of the case and the appellate interference was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>