<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456906</link>
    <description>The Madras HC examined TASMAC&#039;s tender scheme for collecting empty bottles and selling eatables in bars attached to liquor shops against the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 and the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (In Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003. It treated Article 47 and the prohibition framework as permitting only regulated liquor activity and held the existing bar model and auction mechanism legally unsustainable unless the law is amended. It further held that deletion of the no-objection certificate condition did not, by itself, invalidate the tender or entitle the petitioners to writ relief, though it directed TASMAC to discontinue the attached bars within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456906</link>
      <description>The Madras HC examined TASMAC&#039;s tender scheme for collecting empty bottles and selling eatables in bars attached to liquor shops against the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 and the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (In Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003. It treated Article 47 and the prohibition framework as permitting only regulated liquor activity and held the existing bar model and auction mechanism legally unsustainable unless the law is amended. It further held that deletion of the no-objection certificate condition did not, by itself, invalidate the tender or entitle the petitioners to writ relief, though it directed TASMAC to discontinue the attached bars within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>