https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456907 Substantial questions of law in an income-tax appeal were held to be covered by binding precedent, including an earlier decision in the assessee's own case and later Court decisions. As the Revenue did not dispute that position, no further examination on merits was warranted. The Court therefore found no basis for interference and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, answering the questions of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. en-us Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2026 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456907 Substantial questions of law in an income-tax appeal were held to be covered by binding precedent, including an earlier decision in the assessee's own case and later Court decisions. As the Revenue did not dispute that position, no further examination on merits was warranted. The Court therefore found no basis for interference and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, answering the questions of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456907