<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1694 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456909</link>
    <description>The SC permitted the petitioner to withdraw the special leave petition, granting liberty to challenge the SEBI order in the HC. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondent was absent. The bench comprised the CJI, Justice B.R. Gavai, and Justice Surya Kant. Petitioner&#039;s counsel included Mr. Mukul Rohatgi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1694 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456909</link>
      <description>The SC permitted the petitioner to withdraw the special leave petition, granting liberty to challenge the SEBI order in the HC. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondent was absent. The bench comprised the CJI, Justice B.R. Gavai, and Justice Surya Kant. Petitioner&#039;s counsel included Mr. Mukul Rohatgi.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>