https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456895 A prima facie view of the agreement and a retired Supreme Court Judge's opinion indicated that the appellant was acting only in a lender-borrower capacity, not rendering banking and other financial services. On that basis, and with support from the prior Larger Bench ratio cited by the appellant, interim protection was justified. The appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal. en-us Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:42:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456895 A prima facie view of the agreement and a retired Supreme Court Judge's opinion indicated that the appellant was acting only in a lender-borrower capacity, not rendering banking and other financial services. On that basis, and with support from the prior Larger Bench ratio cited by the appellant, interim protection was justified. The appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456895