<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37966</link>
    <description>Estate duty valuation of partnership interests was limited to the deceased&#039;s remaining one-fourth share in the goodwill and tenancy rights. The Revenue had to show that the disputed interests were gifted without adequate consideration, but the son&#039;s admission as a partner, the later change in profit-sharing, and his contribution of labour and participation in the business constituted sufficient consideration. On that basis, the arrangement was not treated as a gift, and section 10 did not extend the dutiable estate beyond the deceased&#039;s surviving share. The Tribunal&#039;s inclusion of only one-fourth of the goodwill and tenancy rights in the principal value of the estate was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37966</link>
      <description>Estate duty valuation of partnership interests was limited to the deceased&#039;s remaining one-fourth share in the goodwill and tenancy rights. The Revenue had to show that the disputed interests were gifted without adequate consideration, but the son&#039;s admission as a partner, the later change in profit-sharing, and his contribution of labour and participation in the business constituted sufficient consideration. On that basis, the arrangement was not treated as a gift, and section 10 did not extend the dutiable estate beyond the deceased&#039;s surviving share. The Tribunal&#039;s inclusion of only one-fourth of the goodwill and tenancy rights in the principal value of the estate was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>