<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 342 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456894</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal by Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh, overturning the Patna HC&#039;s decision and the State of Bihar&#039;s refusal to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal. The SC emphasized that the Government&#039;s role under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is administrative, not judicial, and directed the State to refer the dispute to an appropriate Industrial Tribunal. The judgment reinforced that the Government cannot decide the merits of a dispute or the status of disputants as workmen, ensuring disputes are adjudicated through proper legal channels. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:21:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 342 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456894</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal by Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh, overturning the Patna HC&#039;s decision and the State of Bihar&#039;s refusal to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal. The SC emphasized that the Government&#039;s role under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is administrative, not judicial, and directed the State to refer the dispute to an appropriate Industrial Tribunal. The judgment reinforced that the Government cannot decide the merits of a dispute or the status of disputants as workmen, ensuring disputes are adjudicated through proper legal channels. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>