<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Logical Income Estimation Using Average Net Profit Rates; Partially Allows Revenue Appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80631</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of estimation of income and rejection of duly audited books of accounts of the assessee firm u/s 145(3) of the Act. It held that after rejecting the books of account, the Assessing Officer ought to have estimated the income on a logical basis. Since the income of the assessee firm for the preceding and succeeding five years had been framed u/s 143(3), the Tribunal opined that the average net profit rate of those years could safely be adopted as a yardstick for estimating its income for the year under consideration. This view was supported by the Allahabad High Court&#039;s decision in Dr. Prabhu Dayal Yadav&#039;s case. As the income disclosed by the assessee firm during the year was higher than the average .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Logical Income Estimation Using Average Net Profit Rates; Partially Allows Revenue Appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80631</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of estimation of income and rejection of duly audited books of accounts of the assessee firm u/s 145(3) of the Act. It held that after rejecting the books of account, the Assessing Officer ought to have estimated the income on a logical basis. Since the income of the assessee firm for the preceding and succeeding five years had been framed u/s 143(3), the Tribunal opined that the average net profit rate of those years could safely be adopted as a yardstick for estimating its income for the year under consideration. This view was supported by the Allahabad High Court&#039;s decision in Dr. Prabhu Dayal Yadav&#039;s case. As the income disclosed by the assessee firm during the year was higher than the average .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>