<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1065 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Rs.1,50,000 penalty imposed on the Custom House Agent (CHA) under sec. 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding insufficient evidence of involvement in the alleged misconduct. The Tribunal also rejected the department&#039;s appeal to revoke the CHA&#039;s license, allowing the CHA to continue operations. Both appeals were disposed of, and the appellant was granted consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:15:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1065 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Rs.1,50,000 penalty imposed on the Custom House Agent (CHA) under sec. 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding insufficient evidence of involvement in the alleged misconduct. The Tribunal also rejected the department&#039;s appeal to revoke the CHA&#039;s license, allowing the CHA to continue operations. Both appeals were disposed of, and the appellant was granted consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>