<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 62 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37956</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public limited company, in a case involving ownership of a power line and eligibility for depreciation. The court quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing depreciation for the assessment year 1966-67, directing a reconsideration based on the petitioner&#039;s ownership contribution. Additionally, the court overturned the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the condonation of delay in filing the revision application, emphasizing the need for sound judicial discretion. The court instructed the Commissioner to review the application on its merits, recognizing pursuing the appeal as a valid reason for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 62 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37956</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a public limited company, in a case involving ownership of a power line and eligibility for depreciation. The court quashed the Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing depreciation for the assessment year 1966-67, directing a reconsideration based on the petitioner&#039;s ownership contribution. Additionally, the court overturned the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the condonation of delay in filing the revision application, emphasizing the need for sound judicial discretion. The court instructed the Commissioner to review the application on its merits, recognizing pursuing the appeal as a valid reason for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>