<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1761 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456888</link>
    <description>Punjab and Haryana HC allowed revision petition in a land ownership dispute. Court declined to determine prima facie possession due to pending khasra girdawari correction applications. Status quo ordered regarding disputed agricultural land possession until suit disposal. Court applied lis pendens doctrine but noted it cannot substitute express orders. Further alienation of suit property prohibited without court permission. Parties granted due process rights for revenue entry corrections. Case made time-bound with 10 effective monthly opportunities each for plaintiffs and defendants to conclude evidence, considering defendant&#039;s advanced age requiring expeditious disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1761 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456888</link>
      <description>Punjab and Haryana HC allowed revision petition in a land ownership dispute. Court declined to determine prima facie possession due to pending khasra girdawari correction applications. Status quo ordered regarding disputed agricultural land possession until suit disposal. Court applied lis pendens doctrine but noted it cannot substitute express orders. Further alienation of suit property prohibited without court permission. Parties granted due process rights for revenue entry corrections. Case made time-bound with 10 effective monthly opportunities each for plaintiffs and defendants to conclude evidence, considering defendant&#039;s advanced age requiring expeditious disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>