<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2181 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456891</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed deletion of pro forma respondent No. 6 at the petitioner&#039;s risk and directed the Trial Court to hear the matter expeditiously. It further restricted any adjournment sought on behalf of the plaintiff to no more than one week and only on payment of minimum costs of Rs. 10,000. The special leave petition and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 19:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2181 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456891</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed deletion of pro forma respondent No. 6 at the petitioner&#039;s risk and directed the Trial Court to hear the matter expeditiously. It further restricted any adjournment sought on behalf of the plaintiff to no more than one week and only on payment of minimum costs of Rs. 10,000. The special leave petition and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>