https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877 The HC dismissed the petition, affirming the MAT's ruling that the suspension period following the respondent's acquittal should be treated as permissible leave. Consequently, the respondent is entitled to receive salary and financial benefits for the period of absence from 3-9-1975 to 10-4-1987. The court clarified that under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979, suspension is deemed to have occurred upon detention exceeding 48 hours, irrespective of a formal order, and the appointing authority's discretion is limited to modifying or revoking the suspension. en-us Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877 The HC dismissed the petition, affirming the MAT's ruling that the suspension period following the respondent's acquittal should be treated as permissible leave. Consequently, the respondent is entitled to receive salary and financial benefits for the period of absence from 3-9-1975 to 10-4-1987. The court clarified that under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979, suspension is deemed to have occurred upon detention exceeding 48 hours, irrespective of a formal order, and the appointing authority's discretion is limited to modifying or revoking the suspension. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877