<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1254 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877</link>
    <description>Rule 4(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 creates an automatic deeming suspension when a Government servant remains in police or judicial custody for more than forty-eight hours. That deemed suspension operates from the date of detention without requiring a fresh discretionary order, and Rule 5(a) keeps it in force until it is modified or revoked by the competent authority. On that basis, custody beyond forty-eight hours was treated as deemed suspension continuing until reinstatement after acquittal, and the period could not be regarded as unauthorised absence or altered by a later formal suspension order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=765004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1254 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877</link>
      <description>Rule 4(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 creates an automatic deeming suspension when a Government servant remains in police or judicial custody for more than forty-eight hours. That deemed suspension operates from the date of detention without requiring a fresh discretionary order, and Rule 5(a) keeps it in force until it is modified or revoked by the competent authority. On that basis, custody beyond forty-eight hours was treated as deemed suspension continuing until reinstatement after acquittal, and the period could not be regarded as unauthorised absence or altered by a later formal suspension order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>