https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757336 Special leave petitions were not entertained because the administrative threshold in Circular No. 207/1/2024-GST was not met, the penalty involved being only Rs. 3.25 lakhs. The Court therefore did not consider the substantive merits or the departmental contentions. It also reiterated that the impugned High Court order would not operate as a precedent and reserved liberty for the petitioner to raise any question of law in an appropriate forum. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757336 Special leave petitions were not entertained because the administrative threshold in Circular No. 207/1/2024-GST was not met, the penalty involved being only Rs. 3.25 lakhs. The Court therefore did not consider the substantive merits or the departmental contentions. It also reiterated that the impugned High Court order would not operate as a precedent and reserved liberty for the petitioner to raise any question of law in an appropriate forum. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757336