<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1029 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757325</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the Writ Petition, directing the second respondent to resolve the Appeal within six weeks. The petitioner is protected from recovery proceedings by the first respondent until the Appeal&#039;s conclusion. The Court emphasized the principles of natural justice, ensuring no harassment during the interim period. The Miscellaneous Petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1029 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757325</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the Writ Petition, directing the second respondent to resolve the Appeal within six weeks. The petitioner is protected from recovery proceedings by the first respondent until the Appeal&#039;s conclusion. The Court emphasized the principles of natural justice, ensuring no harassment during the interim period. The Miscellaneous Petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>