<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Lessee can claim depreciation on leased assets despite lack of ownership; Mere academic ownership irrelevant.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80607</link>
    <description>Assessee entitled to claim depreciation on leased assets despite revenue&#039;s contention that transactions were mere financial transactions lacking ownership and usage for business purpose. Supreme Court&#039;s decision in I.C.D.S. case applicable, rejecting revenue&#039;s argument based on lease agreement clauses. Mere academic ownership shown to claim depreciation cannot disentitle depreciation u/s 32. Regarding interest u/s 220(2), ITAT rightly held it chargeable only up to original assessment order u/s 143(3) or 144, not up to order u/s 143(3) read with Section 254. Depreciation on leased assets allowed, consequently no further interest payable after assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Lessee can claim depreciation on leased assets despite lack of ownership; Mere academic ownership irrelevant.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80607</link>
      <description>Assessee entitled to claim depreciation on leased assets despite revenue&#039;s contention that transactions were mere financial transactions lacking ownership and usage for business purpose. Supreme Court&#039;s decision in I.C.D.S. case applicable, rejecting revenue&#039;s argument based on lease agreement clauses. Mere academic ownership shown to claim depreciation cannot disentitle depreciation u/s 32. Regarding interest u/s 220(2), ITAT rightly held it chargeable only up to original assessment order u/s 143(3) or 144, not up to order u/s 143(3) read with Section 254. Depreciation on leased assets allowed, consequently no further interest payable after assessment order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>