<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1009 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757305</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against an adjustment made under ICDS (Indian Accounting Standards) in an intimation u/s 143(1). The case was selected for scrutiny to examine ICDS compliance. The AO issued notices seeking information about the assessee&#039;s claim, which was duly provided with necessary documentation. During assessment proceedings, the AO examined the matter and made no adverse findings, effectively accepting the assessee&#039;s claim. However, while computing income, the AO failed to delete the ICDS adjustment from the s.143(1) intimation despite having accepted it during scrutiny. The ITAT found this error apparent from records and directed deletion of the adjustment, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1009 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757305</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against an adjustment made under ICDS (Indian Accounting Standards) in an intimation u/s 143(1). The case was selected for scrutiny to examine ICDS compliance. The AO issued notices seeking information about the assessee&#039;s claim, which was duly provided with necessary documentation. During assessment proceedings, the AO examined the matter and made no adverse findings, effectively accepting the assessee&#039;s claim. However, while computing income, the AO failed to delete the ICDS adjustment from the s.143(1) intimation despite having accepted it during scrutiny. The ITAT found this error apparent from records and directed deletion of the adjustment, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>