<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 994 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757290</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal where appellant claimed manufacturing activity for CENVAT credit on imported dump truck in SKD condition. The tribunal held that while conversion/assembling of SKD dump truck into finished product could constitute manufacture, the appellant failed to establish essential facts: (1) the actual condition of imported goods and (2) the processes undertaken for completion. Revenue department disputed the SKD claim as goods appeared complete/finished and ready for use. The tribunal found appellant&#039;s failure to provide documentary evidence when requested by authorities was fatal to their case. The factum of assembly being primary condition for manufacturing claim was not established. First Appellate Authority&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 994 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757290</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal where appellant claimed manufacturing activity for CENVAT credit on imported dump truck in SKD condition. The tribunal held that while conversion/assembling of SKD dump truck into finished product could constitute manufacture, the appellant failed to establish essential facts: (1) the actual condition of imported goods and (2) the processes undertaken for completion. Revenue department disputed the SKD claim as goods appeared complete/finished and ready for use. The tribunal found appellant&#039;s failure to provide documentary evidence when requested by authorities was fatal to their case. The factum of assembly being primary condition for manufacturing claim was not established. First Appellate Authority&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>