<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37945</link>
    <description>Under Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fair market value means the price the property would ordinarily fetch in the open market on the date of transfer, not that price reduced by incidental conveyancing expenses. Stamp duty, brokerage and solicitors&#039; fees are therefore not deductible, though development-related outgoings may be relevant where undeveloped land is valued. The Bombay High Court also found no error in the treatment of the 801 sq. yards covered by a road, as that area had already been accounted for through development deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed and the matter was remanded for fresh findings on permissible development expenses and the applicability of Chapter XX-A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 11 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37945</link>
      <description>Under Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, fair market value means the price the property would ordinarily fetch in the open market on the date of transfer, not that price reduced by incidental conveyancing expenses. Stamp duty, brokerage and solicitors&#039; fees are therefore not deductible, though development-related outgoings may be relevant where undeveloped land is valued. The Bombay High Court also found no error in the treatment of the 801 sq. yards covered by a road, as that area had already been accounted for through development deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed and the matter was remanded for fresh findings on permissible development expenses and the applicability of Chapter XX-A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>