<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fireworks Case: SSI Exemption Upheld, Invalid Partnership Claim Dismissed, Partial Duty Penalty Confirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80586</link>
    <description>The case pertains to the clandestine removal of fireworks, denial of SSI exemption, and clubbing of clearances by the department. The key points are: The allegation that the partnership firm continued after the father&#039;s death is erroneous, as there is no evidence of the sons agreeing to constitute a new partnership. Both sons independently manufactured and sold fireworks from separate sheds, entitling them to SSI exemption. The department&#039;s reliance on 711 seized invoices is questionable, as the order does not establish their admissibility or address the lack of evidence for raw material purchases. The use of the &#039;Parrot&#039; brand name, previously owned by the defunct Premier Fireworks, cannot be grounds for denying SSI exemption. The confisca.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:07:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fireworks Case: SSI Exemption Upheld, Invalid Partnership Claim Dismissed, Partial Duty Penalty Confirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80586</link>
      <description>The case pertains to the clandestine removal of fireworks, denial of SSI exemption, and clubbing of clearances by the department. The key points are: The allegation that the partnership firm continued after the father&#039;s death is erroneous, as there is no evidence of the sons agreeing to constitute a new partnership. Both sons independently manufactured and sold fireworks from separate sheds, entitling them to SSI exemption. The department&#039;s reliance on 711 seized invoices is questionable, as the order does not establish their admissibility or address the lack of evidence for raw material purchases. The use of the &#039;Parrot&#039; brand name, previously owned by the defunct Premier Fireworks, cannot be grounds for denying SSI exemption. The confisca.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:07:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>