<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 986 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757282</link>
    <description>HC Karnataka addressed a case involving IGST liability for expat salary payments. The court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments challenging the show-cause notice demanding Rs. 59.57 crore in IGST. The court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed reply within three weeks and mandated tax authorities to adjudicate the matter within eight weeks, considering Circular 210/4/2024-GST&#039;s guidance on service valuation and tax implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 986 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757282</link>
      <description>HC Karnataka addressed a case involving IGST liability for expat salary payments. The court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments challenging the show-cause notice demanding Rs. 59.57 crore in IGST. The court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed reply within three weeks and mandated tax authorities to adjudicate the matter within eight weeks, considering Circular 210/4/2024-GST&#039;s guidance on service valuation and tax implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>