<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1421 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456862</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against revision proceedings under section 263. The revenue authority initiated revision claiming lease charges for gas pipelines were not allowable deductions as they were not passed through the P&amp;amp;L Account but shown in the Balance Sheet. The ITAT found that depreciation and amortization on leased equipment were properly charged in the audited financial statements and adjusted while computing business income. The tribunal held that without adequate foundation showing the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, the suo motu revision power cannot be exercised. The revision order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 19:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1421 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456862</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against revision proceedings under section 263. The revenue authority initiated revision claiming lease charges for gas pipelines were not allowable deductions as they were not passed through the P&amp;amp;L Account but shown in the Balance Sheet. The ITAT found that depreciation and amortization on leased equipment were properly charged in the audited financial statements and adjusted while computing business income. The tribunal held that without adequate foundation showing the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, the suo motu revision power cannot be exercised. The revision order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>