<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1254 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456851</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 vests exclusively in the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner and must be exercised on that authority&#039;s independent examination of the assessment record. Where the proceeding was initiated on a proposal from the Additional Commissioner rather than suo motu satisfaction by the Principal Commissioner, the assumption of jurisdiction lacked statutory sanction and constituted a jurisdictional defect. The revision order was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1254 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456851</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 vests exclusively in the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner and must be exercised on that authority&#039;s independent examination of the assessment record. Where the proceeding was initiated on a proposal from the Additional Commissioner rather than suo motu satisfaction by the Principal Commissioner, the assumption of jurisdiction lacked statutory sanction and constituted a jurisdictional defect. The revision order was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>