<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 981 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757277</link>
    <description>An appeal filed within the GST appellate provision&#039;s further condonable period should not be rejected solely on limitation when the delay remains within that permissible window. Where the original order was also passed without hearing the assessee, the appellate authority is required to examine the matter on merits rather than refuse consideration on technical delay. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for disposal on merits without going into limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 981 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757277</link>
      <description>An appeal filed within the GST appellate provision&#039;s further condonable period should not be rejected solely on limitation when the delay remains within that permissible window. Where the original order was also passed without hearing the assessee, the appellate authority is required to examine the matter on merits rather than refuse consideration on technical delay. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for disposal on merits without going into limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>